ОНЛАЙНОВЫЕ ПЛАТФОРМЫ КАК КАПИТАЛ И КУЛЬТУРНЫЙ КОД: ИЗМЕНЯЮЩАЯСЯ ПАРАДИГМА
Аннотация
Целью статьи является рассмотрение понятия платформ как инфраструктуры и их особенности в городских пространствах. В статье подчеркивается распространение онлайн-платформ доставки продуктов питания в городах и факторы, которые ускорили их внедрение и развитие. Кроме того, в статье предпринята попытка пролить свет на множественность алгоритмов путем разделения онлайн-платформ на отдельные алгоритмические компоненты. Такой подход к анализу платформ способствует пониманию различных способов, которыми алгоритмы этих платформ влияют на пользователей. Наконец, в статье освещаются различные способы управления онлайн-платформами в городских пространствах. Исследование показывает, что хотя и платформы, и правительство устанавливают определенные гарантии прав пользователей, им не хватает стратегических усилий в области технологических инноваций.Литература
Baldwin C., Woodward C. (2008) The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View. Harvard Business School, no. 9, p. 32. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1265155 (accessed: 16.04.2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1265155
Card J. (2017) Financial crises are a ‘filtering mechanism’ for startups. The Guardian. January 24. 2017. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/small-business-network/2017/jan/24/financial-crises-filtering-mechanism-startups (accessed: 24.01.2017)
Chan S., Klareld A.-S. (2022) Platform or infrastructure or both at once? Detangling the two concept’s knotty cross-articulations. Information Research, no. 27. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47989/colis2205(accessed: 30.11.2022) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4126285
Daley J. (2019) Recently Uncovered Thermopolium Reminds us that Romans Loved Fast Food as Much as We Do. Smithsonian Magazine. Available at: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/romansloved-fast-food-much-we-do-180971845/ (accessed: 16.04.2020)
Davidson N., Infranca J. (2016) The Sharing Economy as an Urban Phenomenon. Yale Law and Policy Review, vol. 34, no. 2, p. 67.
Davis G., Shibulal S. (2018) Taming Platform Capitalism to Meet Human Needs. In: S. Rangan (ed.) Capitalism Beyond Mutuality? Perspectives in Integrating Philosophy and Social Science. Oxford: University Press, pp. 207–226. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198825067.003.0011 (accessed: 11.05.2021) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198825067.003.0011
Devendorf L., Goodman E. (2014) The algorithm multiple, the algorithm material: reconstructing creative practice. Available at: https://www.confectious.net/may-15-the-algorithm-multiple-the-algorithm-material-reconstructing-creative-practice-uc-davis/ (accessed: 06.12.2021)
Dijck J. van (2013) The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford: University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001(accessed: 16.04.2020)
Doorn N. (2019) A new institution on the block: On platform urbanism and Airbnb citizenship. New Media & Society, vol. 22, no. 10, pp.1808–1826. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819884377 (accessed: 11.05.2021) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819884377
Doorn N., Mos E., Bosma J. (2021) Actually existing platformization: embedding platforms in urban spaces through partnerships. South Atlantic Quarterly, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 715–731. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-9443280 (accessed: 12.01.2022) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-9443280
Ecker Y., Strüver A. (2022) Towards alternative platform futures in post-pandemic cities? A case study on platformization and changing socio-spatial relations in on-demand food delivery. Digital Geography, no. 3. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2022.100032 (accessed:04.11.2022) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2022.100032
Ganguly S., Ramesh A. (2022) Rules governing India’s gig economy. International Bar Association press release. October 7, 2022. Available at: https://www.ibanet.org/rules-governing-india-gig-economy#_edn3 (accessed: 07.12.2022)
Ghai D. (2003) Decent work: concept and indicators. International Labour Review, vol. 142, no. 2, pp. 113–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2003.tb00256.x
Gillespie T. (2010) The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media and Society, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 347–364. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1461444809342738 (accessed: 16.04.2020) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738
Guyer J. (2016) Legacies, Logics, Logistics: Essays in the Anthropology of the Platform Economy. Chicago: University Press, 329 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226326900.001.0001
Iqubbal A. (2021) Food delivery workers in India: emerging entrepreneurs or informal labour? Digital Empowerment Foundation.
Jalote P., Natarajan P. (2019) The growth and evolution of India’s software industry. Communications of the ACM, vol. 62, no.11, pp. 64–69. Available at: doi:10.1145/3347863 (accessed: 16.04.2020) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3347863
Langlois G., Elmer G. (2013) The research politics of social media platforms. Culture Machine, no. 14.
Mahadevan K. (2021) Demystifying the Dabbawallahs: India’s Lean Food Delivery Operations Explained with Operations Management Practices. Operations and Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, vol.14, no. 3, pp. 277–288. Available at: http://doi.org/10.31387/oscm0460302 (accessed: 10.06.2022) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31387/oscm0460302
Mattelart A. (1996) The invention of communication. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 255 p.
Mol A. (2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. In: B.H. Smith (ed.). Durham: Duke University Press, 388 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822384151
Mooshammer H., Mörtenböck P. (eds.) (2021) Platform Urbanism and Its Discontents. NAi Uitgevers / Publishers Stichting. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429196515-12
Mullen A. (2021) Ancient residues, dietary clues. Nature Food, vol. 317, no. 2. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00296-8 (accessed: 20.05.2022) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00296-8
Nariman F. (2019) Uber India Systems Pvt. Ltd. vs. Competition Commission of India on 3 September, 2019. Indian Kanoon. Retrieved. Available at: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/152787062/ (accessed: 07.12.2022)
Plantin J.-C., Lagoze C., Edwards P. et al. (2016) Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media and Society, vol. 20, no.1, pp. 293-310. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553 (accessed: 16.04.2020) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553
Poell T., Dijck J. van, Waal M. (2018) The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford: University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001 (accessed: 16.04.2020) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001
Pujadas R., Curto-Millet D. (2019) From Matchmaking to Boundary Making: Thinking Infrastructures and Decentring Digital Platforms in the Sharing Economy. In: G. Bowker, P. Miller et al. (eds.) Thinking Infrastructures (pp. 273-286). Tamil Nadu: Emerald Publishing, pp. 273–286. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X2019Tamil Nadu0000062017 (accessed: 16.04.2020) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20190000062017
Reeves S. (2019) Online food-delivery scrambling more than the restaurant industry. China Daily. Global Edition. 20.02.2019. Available at: http://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201902/20/WS5c6d7116a3106c65c34ea6f3.html (accessed: 16.04.2020)
Rossi U. (2019) The common-seekers: Capturing and reclaiming value in the platform metropolis. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, vol.37, no. 8, pp. 1418–1433. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654419830975 (accessed:16.04.2020) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654419830975
Scholz T. (2017) Uberworked and Underpaid: How Workers Are Disrupting the Digital Economy. New York: Wiley, 310 p.
SFLC.in. (2019) Intermediary Liability 2.0: A Shifting Paradigm. SFLC.in. Available at: https://sflc.in/sites/default/files/reports/Intermediary_Liability_2_0_-_A_Shifting_Paradigm.pdf (accessed: 20.06.2020)
Srnicek N. (2017) Platform Capitalism. New York: Wiley, 409 p.
Vanolo A. (2014) Smart mentality: The Smart City as Disciplinary Strategy. Urban Studies, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 883-898. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013494427 (accessed: 16.04.2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013494427
Авторы, присылающие рукописи для рассмотрения к публикации в Журнале, принимают Политику лицензирования, авторских прав, открытого доступа и использования репозиториев.
