Key Issues in the Intellectual Property Court’ Presidium Rulings

Keywords: Russia, case-law, Intellectual Property Court, Rospatent, Eurasian Patent, supplementary patent, Trademarks, well-known trademarks, utility models, unfair competition, legal costs, interim measures

Abstract

The comment reviews key positions in the rulings of the Presidium of the Russian Intellectual Property Court (IPC) issued in October and November 2021. This Chamber hears cassation appeals against the decisions of the IPC first instance and deals primarily, but not only, with matters of validity of registered intellectual property rights. Therefore, this review predominantly covers substantive requirements for patent and trademark protection, as well as procedural issues both in the administrative adjudicating mechanism at the Patent office (Rospatent) and at the IPC itself. The current review covers such issues as the procedure for challenging a Eurasian patent term extension (supplementary patent), legal costs, appeals against the decisions in the areas of unfair competition, well-known trademarks, signs that are contrary to general interests, challenging the validity of a utility model, the adoption of interim measures, the registration of a trademark under Article 6. septies of the Paris Convention.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Natalia Kapyrina, MGIMO University

PhD, Assistant Professor

Maria Kolzdorf, National Research University Higher School of Economics

LL.M., Lecturer

Published
2022-04-30
How to Cite
KapyrinaN., & KolzdorfM. (2022). Key Issues in the Intellectual Property Court’ Presidium Rulings. Legal Issues in the Digital Age, 3(1), 95-110. Retrieved from https://lida.hse.ru/article/view/14319