The Artificial Intelligence Influence on Structure of Power: Long-Term Transformation

Keywords: artificial intelligence, separation of power, structure of power, algocracy, epistocracy, liberal democracy

Abstract

Integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into public administration marks a pivotal shift in the structure of political power, transcending mere automation to catalyze a long-term transformation of governance itself. The author argues AI’s deployment disrupts the classical foundations of liberal democratic constitutionalism — particularly the separation of powers, parliamentary sovereignty, and representative democracy — by enabling the emergence of algorithmic authority (algocracy), where decision-making is centralized in opaque, technocratic systems. Drawing on political theory, comparative case studies, and interdisciplinary analysis, the researcher traces how AI reconfigures power dynamics through three interconnected processes: the erosion of transparency and accountability due to algorithmic opacity; the marginalization of legislative bodies as expertise and data-driven rationality dominate policymaking; and the ideological divergence in AI governance, reflecting competing visions of legitimacy and social order. The article highlights AI’s influence extends beyond technical efficiency, fundamentally altering the balance of interests among social groups and institutions. While algorithmic governance promises procedural fairness and optimized resource allocation, it risks entrenching epistocratic rule — where authority is concentrated in knowledge elites or autonomous systems — thereby undermining democratic participation. Empirical examples like AI-driven predictive policing and legislative drafting tools, illustrate how power consolidates in executive agencies and technocratic networks, bypassing traditional checks and balances. The study examines paradox of trust in AI systems: while citizens in authoritarian regimes exhibit high acceptance of algorithmic governance, democracies grapple with legitimacy crises as public oversight diminishes. The author contends “new structure of power” will hinge on reconciling AI’s transformative potential with safeguards for human dignity, pluralism, and constitutionalism. It proposes a reimagined framework for governance — one that decentralizes authority along thematic expertise rather than institutional branches, while embedding ethical accountability into algorithmic design. The long-term implications demand interdisciplinary collaboration, adaptive legal frameworks, and a redefinition of democratic legitimacy in an era where power is increasingly exercised by code rather than by humans.

Author Biography

Vladimir Nizov, Sber

Candidate of Sciences (Law)

References

Ackerman B. (2000) The New Separation of Powers. Harvard Law Review, vol. 113, pp. 633–729.

Anderson C.W. (2011) Deliberative, Agonistic, and Algorithmic Audiences: Journalism’s Vision of its Public in an Age of Audience. Journal of Communication, no. 5, pp. 529–547.

Andrejevic M. (2014) The Big Data Divide. International Journal of Communication, no. 8, pp. 1673–1689.

Azimov I. (1950) Me, Robot. New York: Doubleday, 218 p.

Barocas S., Hood S., Ziewitz M. (2013) Governing Algorithms: A Provocation Piece. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2245322

Baum S. D. (2017) On Promotion of Safe and Socially Beneficial AI. AI and Society, no. 32, pp. 543–551.

Calabresi S.G. (1998) An Agenda for Constitutional Reform. In: W.N. Eskridge (ed.). Constitutional Stupidities, Constitutional Tragedies. N.Y.: New York University Press, pp. 22–27.

Chomsky N. (2010) The Chomsky Reader. N.Y.: Knopf Doubleday,

Citron D., Pasquale F., (2014) The Scored Society: Due Process for Automated Predictions. Washington Law Review, vol. 86, pp. 1–33.

Coglianese C., Ben Dor L.M. (2021) AI in Adjudication and Administration. Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 2118, pp. 791–838.

Coglianese C., Lehr D. (2019) Transparency and Algorithmic Governance. Administrative Law Review, no. 71, pp. 1–56.

Crouch C. (2004) Post-Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press, 144 p.

Crozier M. (2017) The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. L.: Routledge, 320 p.

Dicey A.V. (1985) Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund Press, 436 p.

Domingos P. (2015) The Master Algorithm: How the Quest for Ultimate Machine Learning Will Remake Our World. N.Y.: Basic Books, 330 p.

Danaher J. (2016) The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation. Philosophy & Technology, no. 29, pp. 245–268.

Danaher J., Michael J. et al. (2017) Algorithmic Governance: Developing a Research Agenda through the Power of Collective Intelligence. Big Data and Society, no. 4, pp. 7–14

Ding J. (2018) Deciphering China’s AI Dream. Future of Humanity Institute. Oxford: University Press, 44 p.

Djeffal C. (2019) AI, Democracy and the Law. In: A. Sudmann (ed.) The Democratization of Artificial Intelligence: Net Politics in the Era of Learning Algorithms. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, pp. 255–284.

Dodge M., Kitchin R. (2007) The Automatic Management of Drivers and Driving Spaces. Geoforum, no. 2, pp. 264–275.

Easton D. (1975) A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support. British Journal of Political Science, no. 4, pp. 435–457.

Easton D. (1979) A Systems Analysis of Political Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 507 p.

Estlund D. (2003) Why not Epistocracy? In: N. Reshotko (ed.) Desire, Identity, and Existence. S. L.: Academic Printing and Publishing, pp. 53–69.

Fraenkel E. (1941) The Dual State. Oxford: University Press, 248 p.

Gaus G. (2010) The Order of Public Reason: Theory of Freedom and Morality in Diverse and Bound World. Cambridge: University Press, 964 p.

Geiger S.R. (2014) Bots, Bespoke, Code and the Materiality of Software Platforms. Information, Communication and Society, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 342–356.

Guriev S., Treisman D. (2019) Informational Autocrats. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, no. 33, pp. 100–127.

Ho D.E., Engstrom D.F. (2021) Artificially Intelligent Government: A Review and An Agenda. In: R. Vogl (ed.) Research Handbook on Big Data Law. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 57–86.

Jellinek G. (2004) General Theory of the State. Saint Petersburg: Juridicheskiy Center Press, 599 p. (in Russ.)

Kalhan A. (2013) Immigration Policing and Federalism Through the Lens of Technology, Surveillance, and Privacy. Ohio State University Law Review, no. 74, pp. 1106–1165.

Kerimov A.A. (2018) Institute of Parliament in Legitimation of Political Power in Modern Russia. Ekaterinburg: Ural State University Press, 343 p. (in Russ.)

Kitchin R. (2017) Thinking Critically about and Researching Algorithms. Information, Communication and Society, no. 20, pp. 14–29.

Kostka G. (2019) China’s Social Credit Systems and Public Opinion: Explaining High Levels of Approval. New Media and Society, no. 21, pp. 1565–1593.

Kushner S. (2013) The Freelance Translation Machine: Algorithmic Culture and the Invisible Industry. New Media and Society, no. 8, pp. 1241–1258.

Mbiti J. (1970) African Religions and Philosophy. N.Y.: Anchor Books, 288 p.

Metz C., Satariano A. (2020) An Algorithm that Grants Freedom, or Takes it Away. The New York Times. June 2.

Mhlambi S. (2020) From Rationality to Relationality: Ubuntu as an Ethical and Human Rights Framework for AI Governance. Carr Center Discussion Paper Series, no. 9, pp. 1–27.

Miyazaki S. (2012) Algorhythmics: Understanding Micro-temporality in Computational Cultures. Computational Culture, no. 2, pp. 1-20.

Musiani F. (2013) Governance by Algorithms. Internet Policy Review, no. 2, pp. 1–8.

Morozov E. (2019) The Real Privacy Problem. https://www.technologyreview.com/2013/10/22/112778/the-real-privacy-problem/

Napoli P.M. (2013) The Algorithm as Institution. Fordham University Schools of Business Research Paper.

Olsen H.P., Slosser J.L. et al. (2019) What’s in the Box? The Legal Requirement of Explainability in Computationally Aided Decision-Making in Public Administration. Courts Working Paper Series. №162.

O’Neil C. (2017) Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. N.Y.: Broadway Books, 272 p.

Peter F. (2017) Political Legitimacy. In: E.M. Zalta (ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/legitimacy/

Petukhov V.V., Petukhov R.V. (2015) Participatory Democracy: Institutional Crisis and New Prospects. Polis=Polis, no. 5, pp. 25–48 (in Russ.)

Poggi G. (1978) The Development of the Modern State. Stanford: University Press, 171 p.

Pound R. (1908) Common Law and Legislation. Harvard Law Review, vol. 21, pp. 383–407.

Relyea H.C., Hogue H.B. (2004) A Brief History of the Emergence of Digital Government in the United States. In: Digital Government. Principles and Best Practices. A. Pavlichev, G. Garson (eds.). London: Idea Group Inc., pp. 16–33.

Roberts H., Cowls J., Morley J. et al. (2021) The Chinese Approach to Artificial Intelligence: Policy, Ethics, and Regulation. AI and Society, no. 36, pp. 59–77.

Scherer M.U. (2015) Regulating Artificial Intelligence Systems: Risks, Challenges, Competencies, and Strategies. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, vol. 29, pp. 353–400.

Scipione J. (2020) Artificial Intelligence and Europe: Risks, Developments and Implications. SSRN Electron J.

Shirky C. (2009) A Speculative Post on the Idea of Algorithmic Authority.

Stamper R. (1988) Pathologies of AI: Responsible Use of AI in Professional Work. AI and Society, no. 2, pp. 3–16.

Sun R., Garimella A. et al. (2020) Transformation of the Transaction Cost and the Agency Cost in an Organization and the Applicability of Blockchain — A Case Study of Peer-to-Peer Insurance. Frontiers in Blockchain, no. 3, pp. 1–15.

Turing A.M. (1950) Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind, no. 236, pp. 433–460.

Viscusi W. (1989) Toward a Diminished Role for Tort Liability: Social Insurance, Government Regulation, and Contemporary Risks to Health and Safety. Yale Journal on Regulation, no. 6, pp. 65–107

Weber M. (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Free Press, 436 p.

Yeung K. (2018) Algorithmic Regulation: A Critical Interrogation. Regulation & Governance, no. 12, pp. 505–523.

Zarsky T. (2012) Automated Predictions: Perception, Law and Policy. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 33–35.

Zarsky T. (2013) Transparent Prediction. University of Illinois Law Review, no. 4, pp. 1503–1570.

Zuboff S. (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. N.Y.: Public Affairs, 704 pp.

Published
2025-07-02
How to Cite
NizovV. (2025). The Artificial Intelligence Influence on Structure of Power: Long-Term Transformation. Legal Issues in the Digital Age, 6(2), 183-212. https://doi.org/10.17323/2713-2749.2025.2.183.212
Section
E-Government