Technologies Versus Justice: Challenges of AI Regulation in the Judicial System
Abstract
The article examines issues of using artificial intelligence in such a sensitive area of human activity as justice. The authors refer to numerous facts on attempts to create a kind of “smart court” in various countries. At the same time, these attempts run up against circumstances that indicate the need to establish legal restrictions on the use of artificial intelligence in the administration of justice. Moreover, according to the authors’ reasoned conviction, there are areas in which the robot judge turns out to be powerless to replace human intelligence. Based on the philosophical and legal approach to assessing such a phenomenon as digitalization and the phenomenology of legal judgment, the authors conclude that the adoption of a court decision that meets the requirements of the principle of justice is something beyond the reach of artificial intelligence. Such a decision can only be made by a human judge, but not by a robot. AI systems in the judicial system should support rather than supersede judges.
References
Cleandrov M.I. (2018) Reflections on the Topic: Could there be a Robot as a Judge? Rossiyskaya justitcia=Russian Justice, no. 6, pp. 15–25 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2072-909X.2018.6.15-25
Djeffal C. (2022) Wie sollen wir künstliche Intelligenz regeln? Public Law Research, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 33–44.
Djeffal C. (2019) AI, Democracy, and the Law. The Democratization of Artificial Intelligence: Net Politics in the Era of Learning Algorithms. In: Digitale Gesellschaft, vol. 25, pp. 255–284. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3535735 (accessed: 16.10.2023) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839447192-016
Ershov V.V. (2019) Law in the Context of the Metamodern Paradigm. Pravosudie=Justice, no. 2, pp. 15–34 (in Russ.)
Filipova I.A. (2021) Labor Law in Transition to a Digital Society: ongoing Changes and Contours of the Future. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava=Journal of Russian Law, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 92–105 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/jrl.2021.036
Fursov D.A. (2021) Robotization of Legal Activities. Rossiyskoye pravosudie=Russian justice, no. 4, pp. 46–53 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.37399/issn2072-909X.2021.4.46-53
Ilyin V.A. (ed.) (1961) Philosophical Issues of Cybernetics. A collection of essays. Moscow: Izdatelstvo sotcialo-ekonomicheskoi literatury, 392 p. (in Russ.)
Johnson–Laird P.N. (1983) How Could Consciousness Arise from Computations of the Brain? In: C. Blakemore, S. Greenfield (ed.) Mindwaves: thoughts on intelligence, identity and consciousness. Oxford: Blackwell, 550 p.
Kant I. (2010) Critique of the Pure Reason. Moscow: Mysl, 736 p. (in Russ.)
Kaufman A. (2019) Philosophy of law, theory of law, legal dogma. Gosudarstvo i pravo=State and Law, no. 5, pp.18–29 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S013207690004857-4
Kerimov D.A. (1962) Cybernetics and Law. Sovetskoye gosudarstvo i pravo=Soviet State and Law, no. 11, pp. 98–104 (in Russ.)
Larenz K. (1979) Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft. 4 Aufl. Berlin: Springer–Verlag, 525 S. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-08715-2
Maltsev G.V. (2016) Social Foundations of Law. Moscow: Norma, 800 p. (in Russ.)
Penrose R. (2005) Shadows of the Mind. In Search of Science of Consciousness. Moscow: Institute of Computer Studies Press, 688 p. (in Russ.)
Rawls D. (1995) The Theory of Justice. Novosibirsk: University Press, 534 p. (in Russ.)
Searl J.R. (1992) The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge (Mass.): University Press, 220 p.
Sinyukov V.N. (2021) Law and Order Theory of V.V. Borisov in the Modern Russian Context: Significance and Prospects. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava=Journal of Russian Law, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 17–32 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/jrl.2021.031
Wiener N. (2019) The Cybernetics and the Society. Moscow: AST Publishers, 200 p. (in Russ.)
Zorkin V.D. (2017) The Essence of Law. Zhurnal constitutcionnogo pravosudia=Journal of Constitutional Justice, no. 5, pp. 1–11 (in Russ.)
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the Licensing, Copyright, Open Access and Repository Policy.
