E-Democracy: A Constitutional Dimension
Abstract
The paper is focused at the issues of e-democracy in Russia as an innovative form of democracy regarded from the constitutional dimension. The effects of IT penetration to change the appearance, content and methods of legal impact on the environment subject to change are discussed. Due to peculiarities unique to constitutional law and its exceptional role as the legal system backbone, digitization has a special effect on this form of regulation. The evidence in favour of the joint competence of the federal and regional authorities over the issues of information and IT technologies based on constitutional realities is presented. It is argued that e-democracy viewed from the constitutional dimension is above all subject to constitutional regulation. As an instrument of democratic rule politically based on the constitutional imperative of overall empowerment of the people, e-democracy is legitimately part and parcel of constitutional law relying on the relationships between democracy and popular sovereignty. Moreover, popular sovereignty, like other types of sovereignty such as the national sovereignty, is an extension of personal sovereignty as a set of inherent, inalienable human and civil rights and liberties safeguarded by the state. The rights including their digital expression make up a traditional and meaningful subject of constitutional regulation. These are primarily the rights to be exercised in whole or for the most part in terms of digital indicators defining the digital status of each person as predated by the constitutional principle of equality that means digital equality of access to IT technologies for all. These rights primarily embrace the constitutional right to information which is guaranteed to all and which includes the freedom to search for, receive, transmit, produce and disseminate information in any legitimate way (part 4 Article 29 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation). Along with constitutional law, e-democracy is subject to information law as a set of provisions governing social relationships in the sphere of information. It is stated that information law is based on constitutional premises characterizing the principles of Russia’s constitutional system.
References
Аbdrakhmanov D.В. (2022) Constitutional principles of informatization of society in the Russian Federation. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Thesis. Cheliabinsk, 244 p. (in Russ.)
Alexeev S.S. (1975) The structure of Soviet law. Мoscow: Juridichekaya literature, 260 p. (in Russ.)
Alexeeva М.V. (2012) The exercise of the constitutional right for information as one of basic human rights. Konstitcionnoye i minitcipalnoe pravo=Constitutional and Municipal Law, no. 7, pp. 16–20 (in Russ.)
Antonov Ya. V. (2016) Constitutional principles of e-democracy in Russia. Sbornik trudov Severo-Zapadnogo Instituta upravlenia=Collected Papers of the North-West Institute of Governance, no. 1, pp. 117–125 (in Russ.)
Avakian S.А. (2019) The information space of knowledge, digital world and constitutional law. Konstitutcionnoye i munitsipalnoe pravo=Constitutional and Municipal Law, no. 7, pp. 23–28 (in Russ.)
Bell D. (1988) The social framework of the information society. In: A new technocratic wave in the West. Мoscow: Progress, pp. 330–342 (in Russ.)
Bondar N.S. (2019) The digital information space as a new focus of constitutional law: doctrinal principles and practice. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava=Journal of Russian Law, no. 11, pp. 25–28 (in Russ.)
Gadzhiev G.А., Voinikanis Е.А. (2018) Can a robot be a person at law (search for legal forms for regulating digital economy). Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki=Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, no. 4, pp. 24–28 (in Russ.)
Goncharov I.V. (2019) Constitutional values in the era of “digital technologies”. Konstitutcionnoye i munitcipalnoe pravo=Constitutional and Municipal Law, no. 11, pp. 15–17 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31085/9785392299218-2019-504
Gong W. (2005) Information sovereignty reviewed. Intercultural Communication Studies, no. 1, pp. 119–135.
Information technologies in legal practice (2012) P.Yu. Kuznetsova (ed.). Мoscow: Norma, 422 p. (in Russ.)
Khabrieva Т.Ya., Chernogor N.N. (2019) State and law in the modern world: issues of theory and history. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava=Journal of Russian Law, no. 1, pp. 85–102.
A.N.Kokotov, M.I. Kukushkin et al. (2010) Constitutional law in Russia: textbook. Мoscow: Prospekt, 543 p. (in Russ.)
Kravets I.А. (2020) The digital constitutionalism and the future of information society. Gosudarstvo i pravo=State and Law, no. 4, pp. 85–104 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.51634/2307-5201_2020_34_85
Кutafin О.Е. (2015) The subject of constitutional law. Мoscow: Norma, 448 p. (in Russ.)
Mamut L.S. (2005) A network state? Gosudarstvo i pravo=State and Law, no. 11, pp. 5–12 (in Russ.)
Popov L.L., Migachev Yu. I., Tikhomirov S.V. (2010) The information law. Мoscow: Yurait, 495 p. (in Russ.)
Shakhray S.М. (2018) Digital constitution: the main personal rights in a totally information society. Bulletin RAN=Vestnik RAN, no. 12, pp. 1075–1082 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S086958730003185-1
Talapina E.В. (2018) Law and digitization: new challenges and prospects. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava=Journal of Russian Law, no. 2, pp. 5–17 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/art_2018_2_1
Тedeev А.А. (2006) The subject of information law in the Internet context. Informatcinnoye pravo=Information Law, no. 3, pp. 3–6 (in Russ.)
Теdeev А.А. (2016) Transforming legal system in the IT development context. Trudy po intellektuaknoy sobstvennosti=Works on Intellectual Property, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 123–140 (in Russ.)
Travnikov N.О. (2016) Main stages of personal development in the information sphere. Sovremennoye pravo=Modern Law, no. 2, pp. 43–46 (in Russ.)
Zorkin V.D. (2018) Law in the digital world: thoughts at the Saint Petersburg international legal forum. Rossiyskaya gazeta. 30.05.2018. No. 7578. (in Russ.)
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the Licensing, Copyright, Open Access and Repository Policy.