On the Definition, Legal Essence and Classification of Electronic Information Used Within the Framework of International Cooperation in Criminal Matters

  • Kirill Klevtsov MGIMO University
Keywords: electronic information, criminal cases, electronic evidence, international cooperation

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of such a complex and multifaceted legal phenomenon as „electronic information“. The aim of the research is to define the concept and legal nature of such information. The analysis is based on materialistic dialectics, legal hermeneutics, special and comparative legal methods, a sociological approach and a forecasting method. The study shows that the doctrine and practice lacks a unified approach to understanding electronic information in criminal cases, often the concept of „electronic information“ is confused with „electronic evidence“, while losing sight of its criminal procedural application. Author comes to the conclusion that there is no legislative definition of the concept of “electronic evidence” and it is still possible to operate with the term “electronic information” today, taking into account its cross-disciplinary purpose, respectively, the author’s definition of this concept is proposed. In addition, an attempt was made to determine the types of electronic information in criminal cases, including those requested in the framework of international cooperation, namely, the provision of mutual legal assistance. As an empirical basis for the study, we used the materials contained in the Practical Guide for Requesting Electronic Evidence from Other Countries, prepared jointly by the UN Office on Drugs and Crime, the Executive Directorate of the UN Security Council Counter-Terrorism Committee and the International Association of Prosecutors in collaboration with the EuroMed Justice programs and Euromed Police.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Kirill Klevtsov, MGIMO University

Candidate of Science (Law), Associate Professor

References

Bauer F.L., Gooz G. (1990) Computer science. Introductory course. Moscow: Mir, 336 p. (In Russ.).

Balakshin V.S. (2002) Evidence in Russian criminal procedure: concept, essence, classification. Ekaterinburg: Ural State Law Academy, 112 p. (In Russ.).

Balakshin V.S. (2004) Evidence in theory and practice of criminal procedural proof. Ekaterinburg: Ural University, 298 p. (In Russ.).

Borisov A.B. (2010) Big law dictionary. Мoscow: Knizhnyi mir, 848 p. (In Russ.).

Burnham U. (2006) USlegalsystem. Moscow: Novaya justitsia, 1216 p. (In Russ.).

Davletov A.A. (1991) Basics of criminal procedural knowledge. Sverdlovsk: University, 152 p. (In Russ.).

Dorokhov V.Ia. (1964) The concept of evidence in Soviet criminal procedure. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo = Soviet State and Law, no. 9, pp. 108–117. (In Russ.).

Golovko L.V. (2019) Digitalization in Criminal Procedure: Local Optimization or Global Revolution? Vestnik ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti = Herald of Economic Security, no. 1, pp. 22–25. (In Russ.).

Idowu S., Capaldi N., Zu L., Gupta A.D. (2013) Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility. Berlin: Springer: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28036-8_100896.

Ivanov N.A. (2013) Digital information in criminal proceedings. Biblioteka kriminalista = Library of Criminalist, no. 5, pp. 93–102. (In Russ.).

Karas’ I.Z. (1990) Economic and legal regime of information resources. Pravo i informatika = Law and Informatics, no. 2, pp. 40–59. (In Russ.).

Kasatkin A.V. (1997) Collecting and using computer information in the investigation of crimes. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Thesis. Moscow, 215 p. (In Russ.).

Kerr O.S. (2005) Digital Evidence and the New Criminal Procedures. Columbia Law Review, vol. 105, pp. 279–318.

Krylov V.V. (1997) Information computer crimes. Moscow: Norma, 285 p. (In Russ.).

Kushnirenko S.P. (2006) Digital information as an independent object of forensic research. Vestnik kriminalistiki = Herald of Criminaltics, no. 2, pp. 43–47. (In Russ.).

Kuvychkov S.I. (2016). Use of information presented in electronic form in proving in criminal cases. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Thesis. Nizhny Novgorod, 273 p. (In Russ.).

L’ianov M.M. (2020) Modern classification of virtual traces. Sibirskie ugolovno-protsessual’nye i kriminalisticheskie chteniia = Siberian Criminalistics Transactions, no. 4, pp. 47–55 (In Russ.).

Malov A.A. (2018) Obtaining electronic evidence from foreign jurisdictions ( United States as a case). Zakonnost’ = Legality, no. 9, pp. 56–60. (In Russ.).

Maslov A.V., Soskova K.A. (2017) Electronic information as evidence in criminal cases. Tsentral’ nyinauchnyi vestnik = Central Scholar Herald, no. 11, pp. 57–59. (In Russ.).

Mason S. (2014) Electronic evidence: dealing with encrypted data and understanding soft-ware, logic and proof. Journal of the Academy of European Law, vol. 15, pp. 25–36.

Meshcheriakov V.A. (2004) Electronic digital objects in criminal procedure and forensic science. Voronezhskie kriminalisticheskie chteniia = Voronezh Criminalistics Transactions, no. 5, pp. 153–169. (In Russ.).

Meshcheriakov V.A. (2002) Computer information crimes: theory and practice of investigation. Voronezh: University, 407 p. (In Russ.).

Moussa A.F. (2021) Electronic evidence and its authenticity in forensic evidence. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 11, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-021-00234-6.

Okonenko R.I. (2016). Electronic evidence and ensuring rights of citizens to protect private life in criminal proceedings: a comparative analysis. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Thesis. Moscow, 158 p. (In Russ.).

Ozhegov S.I., Shvedova N. Yu. (2006) Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language. Moscow: Temp, 944 p. (In Russ.).

Polianskii N.N. (1946) Evidence in foreign criminal proceedings: modern issues and trends. Moscow: Yuridicheskoe izdatelstvo, 142 p. (in Russian);

Polonskii V.M. (1999) Conceptual and terminological apparatus of pedagogy. Pedagogika = Pedology, no. 8, pp. 16–24. (In Russ.).

Pitstsi U. (2019) Litigation Without Truth: Why Our Criminal Trial Sys-tem Has Become a Costly Error and What We Need to Do to Rebuild It. Moscow: Infotropik Media, 280 p. (In Russ.).

Popov L.L. et al. (2010) InformationLaw. Moscow: Norma, 495 p. (In Russ.).

Raenko S.I. (2013) Building information society. Naukaisovremen-nost’ = Science and Modernity, no 20, pp. 189–194. (In Russ.).

Reshetnikova I.V. (1997) The law of evidence in England and the USA. Ekaterinburg: Ural State Law Academy, 237 p. (In Russ.).

Rothstein P.F., Raeder M.S., Crump D. (2012) Evidence in a Nutshell: State and Federal Rules. Minnesota: West Publishing Company, 816 p.

.Salinovskii K.V., Markelova G. Uu. (2001) Evidence-based value of electronic information in the Russian criminal process. Rossiiskiisledo-vatel’ = Russian Investigator, no. 6, pp. 18–19. (In Russ.).

Shaidullina E.D., Shmeleva O.G. (2018) Legislative consolidation of the seizure of electronic correspondence in criminal proceedings. Vestnik Dal’nevostochnogo iuridicheskogo instituta MVD = Herald of Far Eastern Law Internal Ministry Institute, no. 2, pp. 44–49. (In Russ.).

Smushkin A.B. (2012) Virtual traces in forensics. Zakonnost’ = Legality, no. 8, pp. 43–48 (In Russ.).

Sheifer S.A. (2001) Investigation. System and procedure. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 208 p. (In Russ.).

Sokolov Yu.N. (2010) Information technologies in criminal proceedings. Ekaterinburg: Telekommunikatsionnoe pravo, 418 p. (In Russ.).

Stel’makh V.Yu. (2021) The need to change the design of investigative actions aimed at obtaining information transmitted by means of communication. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD = Herald of Peterburg University of Internal Ministry, no. 1, pp. 146–155. (In Russ.).

Strogovich M.S. (1986) Soviet criminal procedure. Moscow: Nauka, 470 p. (In Russ.).

Ursul A.D. (1975) Information in modern science. Philosophical essays. Moscow: Nauka, 287 p. (In Russ.).

Vasiukov V.F. (2016) Some issues of conducting investigative actions aimed at detecting, fixing and seizure of electronic messages transmitted through mobile subscriber devices of cellular communication. Rossiiskii sledovatel’ = Russian Investigator, no. 23, pp. 15–18. (In Russ.).

Vasiukov V.F. (2020) Theoretical and legal aspects of crime investigation using subscriber information. Orel: Kartush, 339 p. (In Russ.).

Vladimirov L.E. (2000) Doctrine of criminal evidence. Tula: Avtograf. 464 p. (In Russ.).

Vorozhbit S.P. (2011) Electronic means of evidence in civil and arbitration proceedings. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Thesis. Saint Petersburg, 235 p. (in Russian);

Volevodz A.G. (2002) Countering computer crimes: legal framework for international cooperation. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 485 p. (In Russ.).

Vyshinskii A.Ia. (1941) Theory of forensic evidence in Soviet law. Moscow: Yuridicheskoe izdatelstvo, 248 p. (In Russ.).

Walker C. (2001) Digital Evidence and Computer Crime: Forensic Science, Computers and the Internet. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, vol. 3, pp. 87–88.

Zaitsev O.A. (2019) Using electronic information as evidence in a criminal case: a comparative analysis of foreign legislation. Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel’stva i sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniya = Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, no. 4, pp. 42–57. (In Russ.).

Zazulin A.I. (2018) Legal and methodological foundations for using digital information as proof in a criminal case. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Thesis. Ekaterinburg, 251 p. (In Russ.).

Zhdanko A.V. (2013) Introduction to General Historiology. Saint Petersburg: Aleteiya, 277 p. (In Russ.). 51. Zigura N.A. (2010) Computer Information as a type of evidence in criminal procedure in Russia. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Thesis. Chelyabinsk, 234 p. (In Russ.).

Zigura N.A., Kudriavtseva A.V. (2011) Computer information as a type of evidence in the criminal process of Russia. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 176 p. (In Russ.).

Published
2021-12-23
How to Cite
KlevtsovK. (2021). On the Definition, Legal Essence and Classification of Electronic Information Used Within the Framework of International Cooperation in Criminal Matters. Legal Issues in the Digital Age, 2(4), 114-129. https://doi.org/10.17323/2713-2749.2021.4.114.129