Personal Legal Status in Context of Technology-Driven Social Experiment

  • Maria Cheremisinova Institute of Law and Comparative Legal Studies under the Government of Russian Federation
Keywords: personal legal status, technology-driven social experiment, legal experiment, interaction of law and technology, protection of individual rights in a digital age

Abstract

Based on the study of relevant research findings, law enforcement practices and content analysis, the paper identifies the peculiarities of social and legal environment reflecting the experimental nature of life of a modern society. The mutual effects of technologies, social relationships and legal regulations are discussed. It is stated that technologies which initially had an uncertain impact (social, economic, political and legal) have set an evolutionary development trend of modern societies worldwide, only to justify the insight into evolving conditions in which the personal legal status is implemented. In identifying the nature of technological revolution at the current stage, a conclusion is made on the implementation of a vast majority of social relationships in context of technology-driven social experiment. The legal features of this experiment making it different from the previous stages of the technological progress are identified, and the importance of convergence of the community and digital technologies to set directions for development of the law is underlined. Special attention is paid to the category of the personal legal status and aspects of its protection. The factors of its transformation in the given context are studied and the impact of the experiment’s legal features on the personal legal status is demonstrated. The paper is aimed at proposing solutions to the issue of preserving legal status of a person as a legitimate party to social and technological processes protected from technocratic manifestations, endowed with the right of choice and opportunities to exercise it. In terms of methodology, the study is based on both general and particular research methods. The former include structured and historical methods while the latter — formal legal method and logical cognitive tools such as analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction. It is proposed to expand the field of application of legal experiment to keep pace with the social relationships dynamics in the context of technological change, help maintain the guarantees related to the established rights and liberties and also contribute to the development of well-balanced legal controls.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Maria Cheremisinova, Institute of Law and Comparative Legal Studies under the Government of Russian Federation

Candidate of Sciences (Law), Senior Researcher

References

Аbliazov N. (2017) The technological singularity. A study of conditions of emergence and implications for humanity. Available at: URL: https://mipt.ru/education/chair/philosophy/publications/aspers/a_1xes5v.php (In Russ.).

Аstafieva О.N., Nikonorova Е.V., Shlykova О.V. (2018) The digital civilization culture: new stage of the understanding of future sustainable development strategies. The cultural observatory. no. 15(5), pp. 516–531. Available at URL: https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2018-15-5-516-531 (In Russ.).

Baturin Yu.М. (2017) Legal violations in online worlds and experimental jurisprudence. In: Papers of international research workshop “Security, conflicts and fight against extremism in Internet: legal aspects”. Мoscow. P. 27–35. (In Russ.).

Bechmann G. (2012) Modern Society: risk-prone, information and knowledge society. Мoscow: Norma. 247 p. (In Russ.).

Big data interpretation and application in jurisprudence and legal practice (2021) Yu.А. Tikhomirov, А.V. Kashanin, V.D. Churakov et al. Мoscow: Yustitsinform. 188 p. (In Russ.).

Bortnikov S.P. (2012) The prospective and retrospective responsibility. Ekonomikaipravo = Economy and Law, no. 12, p. 47–50 (In Russ.).

Boroon L. et al. (2021) The Dark Side of Using Online Social Net-works: A Review of Individuals Negative Experiences. DOI: 10.4018/JGIM.20211101.oa34. Available at: https://www.igi-global.com/article/the-dark-side-of-using-online-social-networks/2769428.

Busch C. (2020) Implementing Personalized Law: Personalized Disclosures in Consumer Law and Data Privacy Law. Available at: https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/publication/implementing-personalized-law-personalized-disclosures-consumer-law-and-data-privacy-law

Casey A.A. (2018) Framework for the New Personalization of Law. Computer Science. Law & Society: Legal Profession. Available at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-Framework-for-the-New-Personalization-of-Law-Casey-Niblett/d0f4605c180ce64d0ff5d-ba7705a5101a0f0c741

Castels М. (2016) The power of communication. Мoscow: Higher School of Economics. 564 p. (In Russ.).

Ceschin F. (2014) How the Design of Socio-technical Experiments Can Enable Radical Changes for Sustainability. International Journal of Design, vol. 8, no. 3. Available at: http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/1308/650

Churgeev V.L. (2015) The technical debt in innovative software projects. Problemy territorialnogo razvitia = Territorial development issues, no. 2 (22). Available at: URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tehnicheskiy-dolg-v-programmnyh-proektah-innovatsionnogo-tipa/viewer

Data protection: comments to legal practices (2020) V.V. Lazarev et al. Moscow: Kontrakt. 174 p. (In Russ.).

Digital civilization (2020) Media communications. Web marketing. Lobodenko L., Shesterkina L. et al. Chelyabinsk: University. 770 p.(In Russ.).

Digital civilization (2018) Russian and the 21th century electronic world. Prokhanov А.А. et al. Мoscow: Knizhny Mir. 288 p. (In Russ.).

Digital law (2021) V.V. Blazheev, М.А. Yegorova et al. Moscow: Prospekt. 640 p. (In Russ.).

Hart H.L.A. (1949) The Ascription of Responsibility and Rights. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 49, pp. 171–194.

Heffe О. (1994) Politics. Law. Justice. The foundations of critical philosophy of law and state. Мoscow: Gnosis Publishers. 319 p. (In Russ.).

Heidegger М. (1993) The question of technology. In: The Coming Technological Singularity: how to Survive in the Post-Human Era. Available at: http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/faculty/vinge/misc/singularity.html

Kirsanov К.А., Popova S.А. (2020) Digital civilization. Mirovye civilizaccii = Civilizations of the world, no. 1–2. (In Russ.).

Khabrieva Т.Ya., Chernogor N.N. Future o fLaw (2020) Мoscow: Norma 174 p. (In Russ.).

Kryzhanovskaya А.А. (2010) Civil liability for the damage caused by complex software products. Мoscow: Norma, 160 p. (In Russ.).

Law and biomedicine (2021) F.V. Tsomartova (ed.). Мoscow: Norma. 136 p. (In Russ.).

Legal capacity: legal analysis (2017) Papers of XII annual scholar readings. V.F. Yakovlev, Т.Ya. Khabrieva, V.К. Andreev et al. Мoscow: Statut. 434 p. (In Russ.).

Legal environment and man (2012) N.V. Vlasova, S.А. Gracheva, М.А. Mescheryakova et al. Мoscow: Yurispridentsia. 249 p. (In Russ.).

Legkodimov N. (2019) End of the privacy age. Vedomosti. = News, 9 July. Available at: URL: https://www.vedomosti.ru/opinion/articles/2019/07/09/806225-konets-privatnoi-epohi. (In Russ.).

Lessing L. (2017) Vast online games need a political structure. Available at: https://mmozg.net/mmo/2017/06/06/professor-lourens-less-ing-onlaynovym-miram-neobhodimapoliticheskaya-sistema.html

Levin A. (2017) Has the Era of Privacy Come to an End? Canadian journal of law and technology, vol. 15, no. 1. Available at: https://digi-talcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/cjlt/vol15/iss1/2/

Medvedovsky I. (2016) The age of hackers: why privacy is gone for good. Available at: URL: https://www.rbc.ru/opinions/technology_and_media/01/04/2016/56fe59b79a7947bb7cf4b4e4. (In Russ.)

Misostishhov Т.Z. (2020) The personalized rights and fundamental rights. Cifrovoe pravo = Digital right, no. 1, pp. 56–73. Available at: https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2020-1-4-56-73

Motin S.V. (1999) Experimental method in the social and legal environment. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Summary. Мoscow, 24 p. (In Russ.).

Omri B., Porat A. (2021) Personalized Law Different Rules for Differ-ent People. N.Y.: Oxford University Press. 256 p.

Pashentsev D.А., Zaloilo М.V., Dorskaya А.А. (2021) Technological change and legal development of Russia. Moscow: Norma. (In Russ.).

Reynolds G. (2003) Nanotechnology and Regulatory Policy: Three Fu-tures Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 180–209.

Rubinstein I. (2013) Big Data: The End of Privacy or a New Beginning? Internationa lData Privacy Law, vol. 3, no. 2.

Saveliev Yu.М. (2015) Concept of legal responsibility. Pravovye issledovania = Legal Studies, no. 10. pp. 61–80. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2015.10.1612. Available at: URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id = 16122. (In Russ.).

Shaw J. (2009) The erosion of privacy in the Internet era. Available at: https://www.harvardmagazine.com/2009/09/privacy-erosion-in-internet-era

Shvetsov А.N. (2011) Information society: theory and practice of the emergence in Russia and worldwide. Moscow: URSS. 277 p. (In Russ.).

Sinitsin С.А. (2020) The Russian and international civil law in the context of robotization and digitization. Мoscow: Infotropic. 256 p. (In Russ.).

Simon S. (2014) Distributed Epistemic Responsibility in a Hyper connected Era. The Onlife Manifesto, pp. 145–159.

Spitsin I.N. (2021) Juridification of artificial intelligence concept and limits of using AI technology at court. Lex Russica = Russian Law, no. 10. (In Russ.).

Steinschaden J.(2011) Social media. Facebook phenomenon. Мoscow

Swati S. (2019) Privacy versus personalization. Available at: https://www.the-future-of-commerce.com/2019/01/28/privacy-versus-per-sonalization/

Talapina E.В. (2019) The evolution of human rights in a digital age. Papers of the Institute of State and Law, no. 3 ,122–146 p. (In Russ.).

Tikhomirov Yu.А. (2015) Law: prospects and risks. Мoscow: Norma. (In Russ.)

Tikhomirov Yu., Kichigin N. et al. (2021) Law and Digital Transformation. Legal Issues in the Digital Age, vol. 2, no. 2. (In Russ.).

Tikhonova S.V. (2017) Juridization of ICT as a driving factor of e-government. Guarantees of Human Rights and Liberties in Today’s World: workshop papers. Мoscow: Prospect. p. 275–278 (In Russ.).

Tumanova А.S., Kiselev R.V. (2011) Human rights in legal theory and legislation of Russia, second half of 19-early 20 century. Мoscow: HSE. (In Russ.).

Valverde M. (2015) Chronotopes of Law: Jurisdiction, Scale and Governance. L.: Routledge. P. 668–673. 50. Varlamova N.V. (2019) Digital rights: new generation of human rights?Collected works of Institute of State and Law, vol. 14, no. 4. (In Russ.).

Vopson M. (1994) The information catastrophe. Available at: URL: https://zen.yandex.ru/media/htech_plus/fizik-melvin-vopson-temnaia-materiia-mojet-byt-informaciei-5f3637ae40616c4c6b9682f1

Yeltsov V.N. (2009) Legal experiment in modern Russia. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Summary. Tambov, 25 p. (In Russ.).

Zook M., Poorthuis A., Donohue R. (2017) Mapping Spaces: Cartographic Representations of Online Data. In: Handbook of Online Research Methods.

Published
2021-12-23
How to Cite
CheremisinovaM. (2021). Personal Legal Status in Context of Technology-Driven Social Experiment. Legal Issues in the Digital Age, 2(4), 3-33. https://doi.org/10.17323/2713-2749.2021.4.3.33